<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>AI原生工程师 on FunkyGod - 投资与AI实践笔记</title>
    <link>https://funkygod.vip/tags/ai%E5%8E%9F%E7%94%9F%E5%B7%A5%E7%A8%8B%E5%B8%88/</link>
    <description>Recent content in AI原生工程师 on FunkyGod - 投资与AI实践笔记</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.7</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://funkygod.vip/tags/ai%E5%8E%9F%E7%94%9F%E5%B7%A5%E7%A8%8B%E5%B8%88/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>国庆假日里想明白一件事：编程语言对 AI 来说，可能本身就是低效的，我们还在纠结编程语言吗？</title>
      <link>https://funkygod.vip/2026/10/2026-10-01-ai-native-engineer-and-programming-language/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://funkygod.vip/2026/10/2026-10-01-ai-native-engineer-and-programming-language/</guid>
      <description>编程语言对 AI 来说可能本身就是低效的：与其争论 AI 写 Java / Python / Go 哪个质量好，不如把注意力放回上下文设计。</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
